Interestingly, a considerable portion (almost one-fourth) changed attitude and trivialized in the same dissonant situation–two strategies that have been regarded as mutually exclusive by some researchers (e.g., Simon et al., 1995). As with varying emotional reactions, people seem to differ substantially regarding how they resolve cognitive dissonance within the same situation. Thus, focusing only on total mean scores is a clear misrepresentation in this case as well. Acharya of Stanford, Blackwell and Sen of Harvard state cognitive dissonance increases when an individual commits an act of violence toward someone from a different ethnic or racial group and decreases when the individual does not commit any such act of violence. Research from Acharya, Blackwell and Sen shows that individuals committing violence against members of another group develop hostile attitudes towards their victims as a way of minimizing cognitive dissonance.

• The predictive dissonance account is highly compatible with the action-motivation model since, in practice, prediction error can arise from unsuccessful behavior.
• The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
• Dr. Vohs discusses the topic as it relates to supporters of Former President Donald Trump justifying one of his controversial tweets in 2019.
• Here, the individual is more likely to retreat from, rather than approach, the situation (Lewis, 2016).
• It can occur when a person holds two contradictory beliefs at the same time.

This is exciting, because it means we’re always learning, but it can lead to cognitive dissonance. When the effort doesn’t seem to be “worth it,” we often make up reasons why it was better than the alternative. This process of effort justification validates the benefits of the choices we’ve made. When we say “yes” to a choice, whether it’s as small as what to order for lunch or as big as where to live, we have to say “no” to something else. This can be a difficult decision when the choices feel equally good or equally bad. In order to explain this phenomenon, psychologist Leon Festinger presented the idea of cognitive dissonance.

Predicting Reduction Strategies: Some Ideas

Temporary capacity, in our model, refers to people’s momentary mental capacity. Sometimes people are simply too exhausted to deal with dissonant situations and might try to find the easy way out (i.e., choosing distraction, escape, or trivialization rather than transcendence, differentiation, or attitude change). Attending specialized therapy sessions such as psychotherapy or cognitive behavioral therapy can help individuals who struggle with cognitive dissonance work through emotional difficulties and disruptive or negative thoughts. Your psychologist https://www.spainlodger.com/hard-summer-music-festival-fontana-leaves-3-dead/ or licensed professional counselor can help you understand your thought process, identify where the feelings are coming from, as well as find ways to change your bias, reduce conflicting beliefs or add new ones. Based on the process model, more recent research has attempted to understand under which circumstances people choose one emotion-regulation strategy over another. Sheppes (2014) argues that emotional intensity, motivational goals (cf. Kelman and Baron, 1968), and cognitive capacity (cf. Kaplan and Crockett, 1968) will influence the decision.

She spends a significant amount of time persuading others to vote for the candidate. Over time she learns information in the news about the candidate’s behavior that challenges his integrity. The woman continues to campaign for the candidate, believing that the opposition is just trying to bring her candidate down.

Take action

In addition to proposing the general model of dissonance reduction, we illustrate at the hand of empirical data how research on dissonance reduction can be performed without relying on experimental paradigms that focus on a specific reduction strategy. Past accounts of dissonance reduction have identified several different factors influencing dissonance reduction (e.g., the type of cognitions in conflict, situational circumstances, influence of other people, individual differences, personal goals, etc.). To illustrate, assuming that dissonance emerges when self-integrity is threatened, and the subsequent reduction strategies assist in restoring the self-concept, the reduction process would be based on an emotional reaction to a perceived threat to the self.

Thus, appraisal theory of emotion, which argues that emotions are generated via the cognitive evaluation of surrounding stimuli, should be applicable to the dissonance-detection process. In short, we argue that dissonance-reduction strategies (attitude change, trivialization, http://www.holland-travel.ru/forum/5/140.html denial of responsibility, etc.) can be understood as emotion-regulation strategies. We further argue that this perspective contributes to reconciling fragmented (and sometimes contrary) viewpoints present in the literature on dissonance reduction.

Actions Speak Louder Than Words In Therapy, Too

Psychologist Joel Cooper recently published a comprehensive update of cognitive dissonance theory after more than 50 years of research. Therapy can help patients by reflecting on and taking http://1-sovetnik.com/articles/article-1196.html control of their thoughts. Sometimes when patients engage in a new, more constructive behavior, they can perceive dissonance simply because it is contrary to the way they used to act.

• In sum, given that the purpose of dissonance reduction is to alleviate emotional tension, an emotion-regulation framework seems to be an appropriate tool for understanding the dissonance-reduction process.
• Moreover, it proposes that human (and perhaps other animal) brains have evolved to selectively ignore contradictory information (as proposed by dissonance theory) to prevent the overfitting of their predictive cognitive models to local and thus non-generalizing conditions.
• However, once the individual is stuck in the situation (situations resembling induced compliance, induced hypocrisy, or effort justification) avoidance is no longer available, and distraction might be too difficult to employ.
• People who experience dissonance but have no way to resolve it may also feel powerless or guilty.
• The basic premise of dissonance theory is that people experience negative affect (to varying degrees) following the detection of cognitive conflict.